Sunday, December 31, 2006
Science Top 10 of 2006
Top 10 readers choice
Top 10 editors choice
Top 10 news features
Top 10 most commented on
Science magazine also has a rundown of top 2006 science and named the solving of the proof of the Poincare Conjecture as #1. The runners up are also briefly described. Obviously lots of overlap with the nature top 10s.
For those without a university subscription to Nature or Science, Discover magazine has a readers choice of top10 science news stories of 2006.
Also the Science Friday podcast (direct XML link) has a typically mediocre review of 2006 science.
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Faster Buzz via CO2 (s) & alcohol
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
The Rabbit & the Fox & urine & poop

Cool stuff. I got a fox face for christmas. The fox face is basically just the hide of the face with eye mouth and ear holes. No other taxidermy specialness.
Anyways I introduced to my pet rabbit (which my wife insists is very cute) and it totally freaked. I tried it a couple of more times and tried to make it's environment otherwise comforting, however, it still FREAKED, sprinting back to it's cage.
Interesting since this rabbit has never even been outside. I would take this to mean that the scent of a fox INSTINCTUALLY freaks out rabbits. The fox is a rabbits number 1 predator, in some habitats, and it's urine scent is actually sold as a rabbit repellent. Is it possible that this repellent works on rabbits even if they have never smelled a fox previously? Perhaps it similar to the instinct that I have that poop stinks. Not that poop is my predator but that it is associated with disease.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Geek's guide to the holidays
Top five things found in the lab suitable as stocking stuffers:
- Rack of 50ml Falcons, you can pass those as a customizable "spice racks".
- A seringe/needle set, for your diabetic cousin.
- A roll of pH paper, for your rich uncle who owns a pool.
- A roll of autoclave tape, always usefull.
- A box of medical gloves, practical for cleaning.
- Eggnog: ddH2O, 5% skim milk powder, 10-40% EtOH (molecular grade, denatured may contain methanol).
- Ice cream: 50 creamers from the coffee club, 30g Glucose, add liquid N2 slowly while swirling.
- Munchies: irradiated rodent food pellets, NaCl.
- Seafood platter: If your model organism is an Echinodermata, you're in luck as they are good raw with some lemon (Other mammalian model organisms may be roasted in the autoclave if need be).
- Marmite: use the LB recipe but dilute less. You may substitute NaCl for glucose and add agar for a jello-type desert.
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
IA updates
" Our goal is to prevent, and also make plans on surviving when possible, particle accelerator mishaps including quantum vacuum collapse, mining the quantum vacuum, formation of a stable stranglet, and the creation of artificial mini-black holes."
The origin of geranyl geranyl
The evolution of robustness
Genomic robustness is just one of those things that seems almost counter-intuitive. For evolution to take place, one needs to have imperfect replication of the genetic material to generate diversity. At the same time mutations are a danger to fitness as the chance that they will be beneficial is slim. And so most organisms have mechanisms to protect against deleterious mutations such as proofreading enzymes, DNA repair enzymes, apoptosis, and redundant genes. And so there is a fine balance in the evolvability rate, where a less stable genome permits higher diversity and presumably a better chance to evolve fast enough to cope with changing environments, versus robustness to make sure the species doesn't go the way of the dodo. A nice article in PLOS asks this question: "And if robustness has evolved to maintain performance, what prevents systems from becoming ever more robust?"
The articles then goes into more details, one of which might interest you virus people:
"Populations evolving at high mutation rates may settle in regions of genotypic space where mutations are less deleterious, on average, than those regions that attract populations that experience low mutation rates. The idea is that evolution at low mutation rates favors populations that achieve high fitness peaks, even if they are surrounded by steep cliffs, because mutations that push progeny off those cliffs are rare. By contrast, at high mutation rates, most offspring carry mutations, and selection favors populations that find lower fitness peaks surrounded by less precipitous mutational chasms. Experiments with digital organisms (self-replicating computer programs) provide direct support for “survival of the flattest” at high mutation rates [8]. RNA viruses also have very high mutation rates, and a recent experiment implicated the importance of mutational robustness for them, in this case, by showing the loss of robustness in viruses that evolved at high multiplicities of infection, where co-infecting particles guaranteed redundancy and allowed their native robustness to decay [9]."
Very interresting stuff. Darwin would be proud. He was rich bitch.
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Creationists are Less Susceptible to HIV

That's right, true-believers. Two trials have demonstrated that circumcision dramatically reduces the risk of HIV infection in heterosexual, African men. In a study of 8000 men in Uganda and Kenya those who were circumcised showed a 50% reduction in new HIV infections. This supports a previous South African study that showed similar (60%) reduction in circumcised males. In fact, the results were so dramatic that the NIH ended the study early claiming it was unethical to not offer circumcision to the control group. The reason for protection is unknown, but it has been speculated to be due to either an increased susceptibility of foreskin cells to HIV infection or that the circumcised penis is less sensitive and less likely to bleed. Dr. Kevin de Cock (*snicker*) of the World Health Organization warns that this is by no means a magic bullet, but is a complementary approach to other HIV prevention methods currently in use in sub-Saharan Africa (such as encouragement of condom use) where AIDS is a devastating problem.
What does this all have to do with creationists? Well, God-fearing folk are more likely to already be circumcised, and therefore already at a lower risk. And while the results of these studies are dramatic, I don't think Richard Dawkins will be marching willy to the guillotine any time soon.
Chemical Origins of Life

The citric acid (or Krebs) cycle is a core metabolic pathway conserved amongst all aerobic cells. How this pathway came to be in the absence of complex macromolecules (enzymes) in the primordial soup is a key question to the origins of life. Several of the steps of the citric acid cycle involve decarboxylation or oxidation and their reverse reactions provide an interesting platform for creating useful organic molecules from carbon dioxide. A recent paper published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society has driven the reverse reactions of several steps of the TCA cycle using photoreactions and a simple mineral catalyst, ZnS (full text, may require subscription). In total, 3 of the 5 reductive reactions of the reverse Krebs cycle were succesfully driven in this manner, demonstrating the plausibility of the idea that useful biomolecules can be generated in a prebiotic system.
Friday, December 15, 2006
Bayblab podcast episode4 part II

In the second half of episode4: Hawking eats babies, a canadian celebrity impregnates american cows, Rob wants to burn the amazon and Jack Bauer is on drugs. PLEASE VOTE FOR US ON DIGG!
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Supernumerary limbs
So a couple weeks ago, japanese researchers found a dolphin with an extra pair of fins near his tail. Obviously all sea mammals had land dwelling ancestors, which explains why cetaceans still have vestigial hind limb bones, even though the limbs never get to poke out. Now most of the patterning and limb development relies on, you guessed it, Hox expression. Therefore this is likely another example of the power of Hox which presumably was desilenced in the protolimb. Is this some sick joke by Darwin, or a test from God? I mean this looks awfully similar to the darwin fish. Lets see what the "Answer in Genesis" has to say about that:"Biblical creationists have been so successful in disseminating information that counteracts evolution/millions of years, that as soon as anything arises that remotely looks like it could in some way support evolutionists/millions of years, it almost immediately becomes headline news." Yes obviously creationists are crumbling under their mountains of evidence, we're just happy to get a dolphin once in a while.
"Because of their obvious evolutionary bias, they have already jumped to a conclusion in interpreting these fins as back legs—before they have x-rayed the fins and carried out detailed research. " Hmm, yes scientists are so biased by facts.
"Homologous structures are seen throughout the vertebrate phyla—but as creationists have pointed out so many times, the homology argument does not support evolution, but rather a common designer. There are many problems with the homology argument as used by evolutionists. For example, the rudimentary male mammary gland and nipple are clearly homologous to those of the female, but they are not taken as evidence that males once nursed their young." Well maybe they should read the bayblab, they could learn a thing or two about that.

I find that last "argument" particularly absurd. Lets take the example of the banana. Creationist call it the atheist nightmare (video included on how to convince atheists about it). I mean what better proof of intelligent design than the banana. It fits perfectly in your mouth (or any orifice really), it tells you when its ripe, it tastes good, it has no seed and it comes pre-wrapped for your convenience! And if you really think about it, doesn't the banana look a lot like a dolphin. It's practically the same shape, but a different colour and it's in the sea and doesn't really fit in your orifices. Obviously they have the same designer. That argument is fool proof. In fact, it's true bananas where intelligently designed, I agree, except it was designed by humans, by very carefull selective cloning. In fact all the bananas out there are sterile clones! In fact this type of clone monoculture is the reason the much better "gros michel" banana was wiped out by disease, forcing us now to rely on the "cavendish". Now for more animals with extra limbs check out this seven-legged transgendered deer... enough said.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
A Trojan Horse Vehicle for Shameless Self-Promotion
A current featured article at nature.com...you gueseed it - "Trojan Horse Delivery of an Oncolytic Virus Circumvents Anti-Viral Immunity". We actually changed the "trojan horse" part of the title to "cell-based" on the last revision at the editor's request, but somehow the good old trojan horse got mysteriously smuggled into the website...
Male Lactation
This post is Anonymous Cowards fault. He mentioned that it existed in the podcast and therefore I HAD to look it up. There is a Wikipedia entry on male lactation, however to me much of it sounds pretty sketchy. While maybe it's possible while men are on hormone treatment or something I'm sure that it is not possible in most men. Articles like this on male lactation add to my skepticism because the author suggests that the male started to lactate using the power of his mind. The power of my mind tells me it's pretty gross and there will be some serious psychological damage to a baby who is forced to feed from a hairy man boob. This link, about halfway down, has another account of male breast feeding, from the Talmud, where it is suggested it was a miracle. I wonder if the infant would agree that it was a miracle.
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Senile mutant ninja turtles
If you have listened to the podcast yet, you'll know that we discuss the subject of aging research to great lenghts during which i bring up the point that perhaps some of the clues of old age could be gained from organisms that do not age or are very long lived. Recently, examples have come up quite close from here, in Quebec. The arctic shark, or greenland shark is found in the St-Lawrence or living under the ice in the North Atlantic. This 6m long beast weighing up to 2 tons may be the longest living vertebrate, presumably because of its slow metabolism and because sharks are long lived in general (and cancer free). Another example is the turtle, which some biologist think might not experience aging at all. Could this be related to their ability to breathe through their ass? The article gives quite a bit of interresting facts on turtles... This one was particularly interresting: "Geneticists have proposed that the turtle shell may have appeared quite suddenly in the distant past, rather than emerging slowly through modest, mincing modifications of pre-existing structures. They suggest that the dramatic innovation could have arisen from just a few key mutations in master genes like the so-called homeobox genes, which help specify an animal’s basic body plan. If the shell did burst on the reptilian stage more or less fully formed, they said, that would explain the lack of “intermediary” fossils or prototurtles in the paleontological record. "
Phage Therapy
Dr. Ken Garson, lab guru and suspected former KGB agent, once told me that in Russia they used to use bacteriophage in operating rooms to prevent infection. Cool.
So I finally checked it out and it was all mainstream science news in 2002. Even making it into Wired magazine article about the promise of bacteriophages as antibiotic resistance increases in prevalence, the article also mentions a company Novolytics that is trying to develop this as a new bacteriophage technology. Also the authoritative Nature News had a nice article that has a bit more background on the previous Soviet technology. Apparently phage creams and such were commonly available there. For the truly interested there have been some sophisticated studies of the effectiveness of these phages, even going as far as to use the Trojan Horse concept.
Monday, December 11, 2006
bayblab podcast: Episode 4 part-I
Finally the latest podcast is born, rejoice. Now with 50% less Rob laughing into the mic. In the first part of episode 4: A fight to the death of Dawkins versus Collins who will win? What to do if your tool gets stuck in the zipper? Can you cook an egg with your cellphone? Why engineers are intelligent designers but biologists suck at fixing radios? Which bayblab crew-member has extra nipples and how to make them lactate and finally how bubble tea may give you more orgasms than you can handle....
Cellular Polarity
Conflicts of Interest
Saturday, December 09, 2006
Patents and Science
Friday, December 08, 2006
IA updates
ViTa database
Pathway Interaction Database
Pfizer is in trouble
Human Epigenome Progect
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Atheists for Jesus
Are people who advocate intelligent design stupid, and do you think natural selection will operate to remove them from future generations?
Not surprinsingly, the reponses are intelligent and often extremely funny. I recommend. 10e692 bayblab points.
What is the most abundant protein in humans? ...on earth?
There is of course differences when you compare moles and mass, as proteins like collagen are massive (>1000AA) compared to something like ubiquitin (<100AA). But looking at mass we can guess something like this...
- Collagen (25% of proteins)
- Actin (20% of dry muscle mass)
- Myosin? (second most abundent in muscle) or keratin (most abundent in epithelium/hair)?
- Albumin? (60% of serum protein,and only 40% of all albumin is present in serum)
- Superoxyde dismutase (most abundent in mitochondria)
- Hemoglobin? (95% of RBC dry mass)
- Osteocalcin (second most abundent in bones after collagen)
However, I have not given up on the idea that it should be a bacterial protein considering they have so much biomass, all to way to 2km down the crust and at the bottom of oceans. I would quote Stephen J Gould for this matter : "When one considers how deeply entrenched has been the dogma that most earthly biomass lies in the wood of our trees, this potentially greater weight of underground bacteria represents a major revision of conventional biology and quite a boost for the modal bacter. Not only does the Earth contain more bacterial organisms than all others combined (scarcely surprising, given their minimal size and mass); not only do bacteria live in more places and work in a greater variety of metabolic ways; not only did bacteria alone constitute the first half of life's history, with no slackening in diversity thereafter; but also, and most surprisingly, total bacterial biomass (even at such minimal weight per cell) may exceed all the rest of life combined, even forest trees, once we include the subterranean populations as well."