data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0080e/0080e479579a3bbae73b568283a6000da61af1e0" alt=""
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Scientists on drugs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0080e/0080e479579a3bbae73b568283a6000da61af1e0" alt=""
Posted by
Anonymous Coward
at
1:56 PM
6
comments
Labels: cognition-enhancement, drug, nature
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posted by
Anonymous Coward
at
1:56 PM
6
comments
Labels: cognition-enhancement, drug, nature
Please note that the content of the Bayblab blog expresses solely the opinions of its individual contributors, and is not associated with any governmental, non-profit, educational, corporate, political or other organization.
6 comments:
why should we be scared? people eat steak which could give them heart attacks to improve their qualia. if there are negative cognitive results later in life, at least they'll have made a positive heightened impact early on....
A fundamental rule of the Internet: online surveys are completely worthless. The amount of attention that this tiny set of self-selected, unknown particpants has generated is absurd.
In other news, a recent study suggests that Nature readers who take amphetamines are more likely to fill online surveys...
If some scientists are using drugs to get an edge, say for their grant application, it becomes a zero-sum game, and if you want to compete you may find yourself more inclined to take those drugs. However I agree that these scientists are probably well aware of what they are doing and the associated risks. It just makes me uneasy. We're already sacrificing a lot for this career, should we be putting our mental health on the line?
Well you're already putting your mental health online in this career. But true, you shouldn't have to inflict any more damage than necessary...
These drugs improve focus, but that's just one aspect of functioning as a scientist. This post talks about the tradeoffs of these drugs: focus may come at the cost of creativity.
Post a Comment