- Appeal of the topic: 10/10. Who doesn't enjoy discussing how fat americans are.
- Analogies: 6/10. Definately pop-sci level analogies. Something about musical chairs. Usage of very bad puns. Somehow included pictures of his african safari into the talk.
- Powerpoint: 9/10. I was disapointed by the lack of animation, but he makes up for it by including videos of mice running on treadmills. Mystery western blot pops-out in the end.
- Delivery: 8/10. Mannaged a couple of jokes. His voice was soothing but he was animated enough to keep us interested. Purple stripped tie focused our attention on him.
- Cookies: 0/10. No coffee or cookies. Big mistake in the afternoon.
Monday, October 23, 2006
Gairdner award lecture
Posted by
Anonymous Coward
at
5:35 PM
3
comments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I enjoyed both the lecture but would go with Tom Pollard's if I had to pick a favorite. Although the details of the subject (actin cytoskeleton and motility) are probably of less interest to me (probably just because his work is so fundamental you tend to take it for granted), you gotta give props to a guys who has spent his entire lengthy career studying 2 fundamental questions. Also for having the foresight to actually choose from the outset a question that could fuel research for that many years. Mostly though he was really sharp, enthusiastic, totally into his field, first principles oriented and spoke at a fast clip without repeating himself as a lot of speakers do!
I agree with the bayman. Tom Pollard was awesome. I think I will actually remember some of the details that Dr. Pollard talked about even though it is way out of my field because it was so enthusiastic. With MOVIES!
Can you guys post a short bayblab review for those of us who missed it :(
Post a Comment