This paper in PLOS goes into even more details in the mechanisms: "In contrast, the studies described herein reveal an effect of BPA on meiotic chromosome segregation by a second, and completely independent, mechanism, that is,by disturbing synapsis and recombination between homologs in the fetal ovary. The finding that unexposed ERβ-null females exhibit a similar phenotype—and that the phenotype cannot be enhanced by BPA exposure—suggests that BPA exerts its effects on the fetal ovary by interfering with ERβ-mediated cellular responses."
Monday, January 15, 2007
"scrambling eggs in plastic bottles"
This paper in PLOS goes into even more details in the mechanisms: "In contrast, the studies described herein reveal an effect of BPA on meiotic chromosome segregation by a second, and completely independent, mechanism, that is,by disturbing synapsis and recombination between homologs in the fetal ovary. The finding that unexposed ERβ-null females exhibit a similar phenotype—and that the phenotype cannot be enhanced by BPA exposure—suggests that BPA exerts its effects on the fetal ovary by interfering with ERβ-mediated cellular responses."
Posted by
Anonymous Coward
at
2:04 PM
3
comments
Labels: BPA, estrogen, fertility, nalgene, plastic bottle
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Those plastics seems pretty stable...how much of it are people actually eating?
That being said there might be some bonuses to having estrogen mimics in the environment...
Check out the nalgene link from the post. They link to ressources on BPA, all of which say stuff like "Bisphenol A is an industrial chemical used primarily to make polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins – both of which are used in countless applications that make our lives easier, healthier and safer, each and every day."
or undermine the article i linked too " * The study has not been replicated by other scientists.
* Comprehensive, large-scale studies (while they may in theory have failed to detect increased oocyte chromosomal abnormalities) have not shown any increase in actual birth defects.
* Previous studies appearing to show BPA effects have not been reproducible.
* The single study by Hunt is unlikely to change the prevailing weight of scientific evidence, which the FDA and other scientific bodies say show no risk from "environmental endocrine disruptors."
* Health effects in humans are probably even less likely than health effects in mice, since a recent study (by Volkel et al) suggests that BPA is far more rapidly and completely metabolized in humans than in rodents, decreasing the odds of it doing damage by lingering in the body.
* Humans are not routinely exposed to the large amounts of the chemical that the mice were. "
Post a Comment